Summary
In a new publication, Foster et al (2022) lay out a method to test whether a non-native species has stabilized its range expansion in its introduced range using its invasion history. They use the expansion of Dog-strangling vine, Vincetoxicum rossicum, in North America over the past century as a case study. This species is an aggressive invader with limited control options once it establishes so it is critical to predict how far the species will spread. Their study contributes four findings that help us better understand when we have sufficient data to apply models to predict the spread of invasive species. First, they found that models built on data early on in in the invasion history did not accurately predict its range expansion over the next century. Second, models built on data in the past 50 years were a lot better at determining which areas were likely to be suitable for the species and how far the species was likely to have spread by present-day. Third, tracking the range of environments an invading species occupies can help us determine when we have enough data to make accurate models. Finally, the spread of V. rossicum was mainly determined by human population density.